kuidas modereerida?

Teeks väikse kokkuvõtte Clay Shirky ettekandest.

Alustaks tsitaadiga : “Once a group attains a certain size some kind of moderation becomes necessary to protect the group from the tragedy of the commons, which in online communities often manifests itself as the fallacy of free speech (the belief that freedom of speech is the inalienable right to say whatever you want, whenever you want, as often as you want and that that right trumps any concerns of the community).”

Lisaks ühe graafiku. Selle peate ise mõttes joonistama. Horisontaalteljel oleks ‘notepad’ ja ‘mailinglist’. Kui paljudele inimestele on mingi jutt mõeldud, kas kirjutad endale või teistele. Vertikaalteljel ‘I agree!’ ning “I disagree!”. Tavaliselt inimestele meeldivad enda mõtted ja ideed, teiste omad on lihtsalt kas lollid, tüütud või kasutud. Selle võib ka asendada väärtustega ‘we’ ja ‘them’.

Kuidas modreerida? Mõned strateegiad, asjalikematele või nendele mis olid põhjalikumalt lahti kirjutatud lisasin lingid.

Preventive Moderation
Don’t have features
Don’t have a community
Discourage submissions
Deflect growth?
Treat users and members differently
Treat readers and writers differently
Top layer harder to change
Rating, not ranking?
Don’t measure with visible numbers
User ratings
Bipolar karma
Homesteading
Core group
Make friendship expensive
-> ! Make friendship cheap
Friendship as two one-way links
-> ! Friendship as one two-way link?
Friend of a friend?
Only friends can read?
Only friends can post

Post-facto Moderation
Delete with notification
Thread coup
Slip sync
See no evil
Vigilante moderators
Get a room
Killfiles
IP blacklist

Moderation Styles
Let the users decide
Editorial Control
Anyone can comment?
-> Members can comment?
-> Authenticated users can comment?
Leave the nuance to the humans
Longevity over serenity
TimedRelease
Rapid turnover?
StyleOverSubstance
User agreement
Judges can’t post
Netiquette

Lisaks siia veel kokkuvõtte slashdoti foorumi põhimõtetest, müra\signaali suhtest ning info üleküllastusest.